Study Top quality Investigations
The fresh indicate analysis top quality score over the 41 posts meeting inclusion criteria is 6.2 (eTables step one and you can 2 throughout the Complement). A few degree (4.9%) dropped about lowest-top quality range, and you may ten education (24.4%) was regarding moderate-high quality variety, into left 30 training (70.7%) throughout the large-quality variety. The 2 studies deemed to own reduced methodological high quality have been got rid of regarding analyses. Ergo, the remainder 39 education were used in further meta-analyses.
Attempt Features of Included Degree
A total of 39 degree came across all research and you will methodological inclusion requirements. Degree was basically designed for delivering (n = 34), choosing (letter = 20), forwarding instead of consent (letter = 5), or having an effective sext sent instead consent (letter = 4). Brand new Table summarizes integrated studies. Overall along the 39 studies, 110 380 members was indeed included, with an indicate period of years (age range, eleven.9-17.0 years). An average of, 47.2% from users was male. Twenty-several studies (56.4%) was basically on United states, twelve training (31.8%) have been from Europe, 2 education (5.1%) had been away from Australian continent, 1 analysis (dos.6%) was out of Canada, step 1 research (dos.6%) is off Southern area Africa (dos.6%), and 1 investigation (2.6%) is actually out-of Southern Korea. To try to get education (46.2%) checked out sexting using cellphones and you will servers, with 6 studies (15.4%) using servers only, 14 studies (thirty-five.9%) thru mobiles only, and another studies (dos.6%) taking diminished recommendations getting dedication. 11 studies (twenty eight.2%) expected professionals throughout the sexting via photographs, fourteen studies (thirty-five.9%) through photo otherwise films, 7 knowledge (17.9%) thru images and you will/or direct messages, and you can eight studies (17.9%) through pictures, films, and/or direct messages. Eventually, 30 degree (79.5%) was had written in fellow-examined journals, and 8 training (20.5%) was indeed unpublished.
Dining table.
Abbreviations: Both, research focuses on sexting via either a mobile device or the internet; FW-P, research is targeted on if respondents common others’ sexts instead of its agree; FW-V, research focuses on if respondents got sexts shared with anyone else without the agree; Yards, intimately explicit texts; Cellular, study is targeted on sexting through cell phones; NCPTUP, National Venture to end Teen and you may Unplanned Maternity; On the internet, data concentrates on sexting online; P, pictures; Roentgen, investigation focuses primarily on acquiring texts; S, analysis targets giving texts; Unspecified, analysis cannot give enough recommendations to choose the mode out-of sexting; V, clips.
Mutual Prevalence off Giving a beneficial Sext
The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P < .001,>
Tree Spot of the Perception Models for each Data Found in the newest Meta-study to your Frequency of Sending good Sext
Found is a tree plot of degree as part of the meta-studies. The entire summary estimate to have giving good sext is 14.8% (95% CI, several.8%-16.8%). NCPTUP indicates Federal Campaign to cease Teenager and you can Unexpected Pregnancy.
A beneficial meta-regression analysis revealed a beneficial linear rise in frequency just like the decades enhanced (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Impact systems was indeed along with moderated because of the year of investigation analysis collection, having a revealed increase in the brand new frequency away from delivering a great sext throughout the years (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Messaging outlet in addition to told me ranging from-study variability, with a higher prevalence away from sexting to the smart phones (k = 13; thirteen.4%; 95% CI, nine.0%-17.7%) in contrast to servers (k = 4; mujeres bonitas Nigeriano 5.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-8.6%), in which k ways how many degree. Frequency wasn’t moderated by intercourse, geographic venue, message articles, otherwise guide condition.